CALLING ALL LOCAVORES
Local Food is now a “movement” with its own vocabulary and initiatives.
Something’s
happening here. Local food is now a movement. There is so much interest
in eating local food that new words are being created to describe what
was, until recent human history, the only way one could eat.
The New Oxford American Dictionary announced last November that the 2007 Word of the Year is (drum-roll please) “Locavore.”
Locavore was coined two years ago by a group of four women in San
Francisco who proposed that local residents should try to eat only food
grown or produced within a 100-mile radius. The locavore movement
encourages consumers to buy from farmers’ markets or even to grow or
pick their own food, arguing that fresh, local products are more
nutritious and taste better. Locavores also embrace local food as an
environmentally friendly measure, since the average American food item
travels 1500 miles to market (and that’s just domestic products).
Other regional movements have emerged since then, though some groups refer to themselves as localvores rather than locavores.1 Jessica Prentice, one of the authors of the word, explains.
“I
thought about both ‘localvore’ and ‘locavore’ and decided on the
latter. First of all, it’s easier to say, has a better flow, and almost
sounds like a ‘real’ word. But also my understanding is that the prefix
‘loc(a)’ has to do with place — as in ‘location’, ‘locomotive’ and
‘locus’... The ending ‘vore’ has to do with eating, and is the same
root as the word ‘devour’. To me the word locavore means, in a sense,
‘a person who eats the place’ or even ‘one who eats with a sense of
place’ or, better yet, ‘one who devours the place’ (I enjoy eating).
“New
England localvores added the ‘L’ because (I believe) they didn’t like
the association with ‘loca’ as in the Spanish for ‘crazy.’ I live on
the West Coast, where ‘loca’ in that sense is more a positive than a
negative. We’re less serious out here... :-) Also, if journalists
wanted to question me on that association, it would be an opportunity
to explain that what is really crazy is the amount of unnecessary
importation and exportation of food that currently happens in our
globalized food system.” 2
When
I attended a marketing conference for food co-ops last October, I heard
another new word that sounded rather strange to me. In a presentation
about local food, Doug Walter of the Davis Food Co-op in California
referred to the area they defined as local as a “foodshed.” I’d heard of watershed, and tool shed, but foodshed?
It
turns out that foodshed is not a new word made up by marketers. The
term foodshed, borrowed from the concept of a watershed, was coined as
early as 1929 to describe the flow of food from the area where it is
grown into the place where it is consumed. Recently, the term has been
revived as a way of looking at and thinking about local, sustainable
food systems.3
On the heels of foodshed is the word “farmshed.”
A farmshed is the network of people, businesses, organizations, and
productive lands that create a local food economy. Similar in concept
to a foodshed, the farmshed idea helps us envision and strengthen our
community’s relationship with the regional landscape.
That
we have to have a movement complete with specialized language, focus
groups and political funding to encourage the creation of stronger
local food networks is a sobering wake up call to just how disconnected
we Americans (and even Wisconsinites) have become from our food.
One
of the online responses I read on the discussion page of the “locavore”
announcement was: “Hmmmm…..locavore - makes sense it was coined in San
Francisco - for those of us living where it is winter 9 months of the
year (and poor skiing the other 3) we’d be looking at scurvy and worse
if we were locavores. Another nice conceit for those in lotus land!”
Hmmm. Try telling that to my dear departed grandparents, Verna and Alfred Geiger.
Verna
& Alfred raised ten children on a Dodge County Wisconsin farm
during the depression. Too poor to own their own land, Alfred was a
laborer on someone else’s farm, but they were provided with a house to
live in (where my mother remembers waking up to frost on the covers),
an area to garden and raise ducks and chickens, and a dollar a day for
wages. I’m sure the Geiger’s ate 95% local food, mostly of their own
making, out of sheer necessity. And all of their children survived into
adulthood without getting scurvy.
While
I was raised in Madison rather than on a farm, my mother Arlene passed
on her local food preservation skills to all of her ten children. Lots
of mouths to feed, but lots of hands for harvesting, washing, peeling,
chopping, canning & freezing. She bought food at farmers markets
and U-pick farms. She even bought live chickens, butchered them on the
farm she purchased them from, brought them home and canned chicken and
dumplings. Lest you think Arlene had plenty of time on her hands, she
also worked at least 3 part time jobs.
So,
I know that eating locally can be done, whether you live in a city
without access to a garden or in the country. And it can even be done,
thanks to the demand that has created more availability of products,
without having to process your own food. As Michael Pollen says in In
Defense of Food “…before the resurgence of farmers’ markets, the rise
of the organic movement, and the renaissance of local agriculture now
underway across the county, stepping outside the conventional food
system simply was not an option for most people. Now it is. We are
entering a postindustrial era of food; for the first time in a
generation it is possible to leave behind the Western diet without also
having to leave behind civilization.” 4
I
don’t think the point of the local food movement is to convince every
person to eat 100% local, but rather to increase our purchase of local
foods consistent with our values and develop stronger local food
networks. There are real consequences for the choices we make when
eating food. There are consequences for our health, the health of our
food culture, the health of our local economy, and the health of the
land (locally, as in clean groundwater, and globally, as in climate
change).
For example, “If every US Citizen ate just ONE MEAL A WEEK (any meal) composed of locally and organically raised meats and produce, we would reduce our country’s oil consumption by over 1.1 MILLION BARRELS OF OIL every week.
That’s not gallons, but barrels. Small changes in buying habits can
make big differences. Becoming a less energy-dependent nation may just
need to start with a good breakfast.”5
Here
at the Viroqua Food Co-op, we label food that is grown or produced
within a 50-mile radius of Viroqua as Local. Next time you’re shopping,
watch for these green labels and you’ll be surprised just how many
products you can buy even off-season that are local. You don’t have to
wait until spring to consume Wisconsin meat, cheese, milk, eggs, bread,
spinach, root vegetables, celeriac, ice cream, frozen pizza, beer,
wine, salsa, granola and sauerkraut, to name a few.
Even
making small, incremental changes in one’s food purchasing takes some
thought and advance planning. Take advantage of the time between now
and September to research what is available locally, consider menus and
recipe options. We will continue to provide information on local food
in each issue of the Pea Soup and on our website leading up to the
challenge. Be sure to check out the list of local food resources, local
farmers and producers on our website, viroquafood.coop/food-thought.
“The
more eaters who vote with their forks for a different kind of food, the
more commonplace and accessible such food will become.” 4
Charlene Elderkin
Marketing & Membership Manager
1 Oxford University Press blog, http://blog.oup.com/2007/11/locavore
2 http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/005109.html
3 http://www.cias.wisc.edu/foodshed/index.html
4 Pollen, Michael, In Defense of Food. Penguin Press, 2008, pg. 14
5 Kingsolver, Barbara, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, A year of Food Life. Harper-Collins, 2007, pg. 5